POS Comparisons

Linga POS vs Owner.com: Which POS Is Better? (2025)

By Mauricio Nov 13, 2025 3 min read

In the battle of Linga POS versus Owner.com, both systems bring unique strengths to the table. Linga POS is particularly strong for Multi-location restaurants wanting cloud POS, while Owner.com excels at Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. Whether you prioritize True cloud architecture or Commission-free ordering, this comparison covers everything you need to know.

Quick Comparison: Linga POS vs Owner.com

FeatureLinga POSOwner.com
CategoryRestaurantSoftware
Starting Price$69.99/month$249/month
Rating4.0/54.5/5
Target BusinessSmall Business to Mid-MarketSmall Business to Mid-Market
Pricing ModelSubscriptionSubscription
Free TrialYesNo
Free VersionNoNo
Best ForMulti-location restaurants wanting cloud POSRestaurants wanting direct customer relationships

Linga POS Overview

Linga POS is a cloud-based restaurant management system with features for full-service, quick-service, and bar operations. Includes online ordering, inventory management, and multi-location support.

Linga POS is offered by Linga Inc. (founded 2013) based in Houston, TX. The system focuses on Full Service, Quick Service, Bars.

Looking for a POS system? Get free quotes from top vendors

Key Features:

  • Cloud POS
  • Online Ordering
  • Inventory Management
  • Multi-location
  • Loyalty Programs
  • Reporting

Owner.com Overview

Owner.com is a restaurant website and ordering platform that helps restaurants build direct customer relationships. Features custom websites, online ordering, and marketing automation.

Owner.com is offered by Owner.com (founded 2019) based in Palo Alto, CA. The system focuses on Restaurants.

Key Features:

  • Custom Website
  • Online Ordering
  • Marketing Automation
  • Guest Database
  • SEO Tools
  • Analytics

Feature Comparison

Linga POS Features:

  • Cloud POS
  • Online Ordering
  • Inventory Management
  • Multi-location
  • Loyalty Programs

Owner.com Features:

  • Custom Website
  • Online Ordering
  • Marketing Automation
  • Guest Database
  • SEO Tools

When comparing features, Linga POS stands out with True cloud architecture, while Owner.com differentiates itself with Commission-free ordering. Your choice should depend on which features align better with your specific business requirements.

Pricing Comparison

Pricing AspectLinga POSOwner.com
Starting Price$69.99/month$249/month
Pricing ModelSubscriptionSubscription
Price RangeMid-rangeMid-range
Free TrialAvailableNot available
Free VersionNoNo

Both systems offer competitive pricing for their respective feature sets. Consider the total cost of ownership including hardware, processing fees, and add-on modules when making your decision.

Pros and Cons

Linga POS

Pros:

  • Cloud flexibility
  • Multi-location support
  • Comprehensive features
  • Modern interface

Cons:

  • Newer to market
  • Limited third-party reviews
  • Learning curve

Owner.com

Pros:

  • No commission ordering
  • Strong marketing tools
  • Customer data ownership
  • Professional websites

Cons:

  • Higher monthly cost
  • Not a POS system
  • Requires separate POS

Who Should Choose Linga POS?

Linga POS is ideal for Multi-location restaurants wanting cloud POS. The system is particularly well-suited for Full Service, Quick Service, Bars.

However, Linga POS may not be the best fit for Very small single-location cafes.

Who Should Choose Owner.com?

Owner.com is ideal for Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. The system is particularly well-suited for Restaurants.

However, Owner.com may not be the best fit for Those needing full POS functionality.

Our Recommendation

Both Linga POS and Owner.com are solid POS solutions, but they excel in different areas. Choose Linga POS if you’re Multi-location restaurants wanting cloud POS. Choose Owner.com if you’re Restaurants wanting direct customer relationships. Owner.com has a higher user rating (4.5 vs 4.0). We recommend trying demos or free trials of both systems before making your final decision.